Case Study · A Retirement Tax Diagnostic

The Impending Retirement Tax Bill in Jared’s $5 Million IRA

What an ER physician1 found on his Retirement Tax Diagnostic™.

Red Mountain Financial  ·  A hypothetical example  ·  12 minute read

See your own Lifetime Tax Bill →
A Retirement Tax Diagnostic report on a kitchen counter beside a coffee mug and reading glasses.

The most uncomfortable conversation an ER physician1 ever had wasn’t with a patient’s family. It was with himself, in his kitchen, with a printout on the counter.

The thing about being a physician is that you live in the details. You’ve spent your career drilling into small variables like the lab value that doesn’t quite fit, the dose that needs adjusting for renal function, or the efficacy data behind a protocol everyone follows without question. Your professional life rewards depth, attention, and the willingness to ask one more question when something doesn’t add up.

So when Jared, a hypothetical physician, learned, at fifty-four, that something fairly important had been missed on his own balance sheet for the better part of his career, the hardest part wasn’t the loss.

It was the conversation with himself.

He’d done what he was supposed to do. Maxed his 401(k) every year since residency. Took the hospital’s match. Picked sensible target-date funds. Paid down the mortgage. Built an emergency fund. Wrote the Vanderbilt tuition checks for the children without flinching. Listened, dutifully, to the financial advisor he’d had for fifteen years. He was a perfectly nice guy who managed the investments competently, returned calls promptly, but never once put the lifetime tax bill in front of him.

Caroline, five years younger, had given up nursing when their oldest was born and ran the household the way Jared used to run a busy ER bay… quietly, in order, with nothing falling through the cracks. She trusted him to handle the money the way he trusted her to handle the kids. They were a team. They were doing well. They were on track.

He thought.

The conversation that broke it open was a casual one, the way these things often are. A physician friend, ten years older, mentioned over lunch that he’d been doing Roth conversions for the last seven years. Said it almost in passing, similar to the way you mention a procedure you know your colleague has performed hundreds of times. Jared nodded the way you nod when a patient’s family quotes a medical term half right. He’d heard the term Roth conversion before. Many physicians have, somewhere, at some point. He’d just never asked the next question, which was whether he was the kind of person who should be doing them.

That night he went home and started reading. By midnight he had three browser tabs open and the beginning of a feeling he usually only got in the ER, when something in a patient’s chart didn’t quite fit the picture: I have missed something. I don’t know what. I need to find out. He’d never appreciated how much difference any of this could make. He was starting to wonder if he should have.

Handwritten retirement planning notes beside diagnostic report pages, reading glasses, and a coffee mug.

He requested a retirement tax analysis from a planner one of his colleagues recommended.

“The hardest part wasn’t the number. It was that other doctors my age had been doing this for years. Many other physicians who caught it early didn’t figure it out on their own either. They had someone put the numbers in front of them.”

One chart. One line. The path he was on.

When the report came back, it ran a single chart across the page. One line. The path he was on.

Jared’s Estimated Tax in Retirement — the path he was on.

$0 $200k $400k $600k $800k ANNUAL FEDERAL TAX 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 JARED’S AGE RETIRES AT 60 RMDs BEGIN AT 75
Lifetime federal income tax, projected through Caroline’s age 90 $9.5 million

Hypothetical example shown for illustrative purposes only; figures are not guaranteed and do not reflect any specific investment. Assumptions: $5,000,000 in pre-tax retirement accounts (401(k) and IRA) earning 8.0%; $100,000 taxable earning 5.2%; Social Security of $43,000 for Jared and $22,000 for Caroline; 2.5% inflation; tax applied to inflation-adjusted brackets including RMDs. Your actual results will vary based on your unique financial circumstances, tax rates, and the performance of the investment products within your plan.

On the path he was on, the household’s lifetime federal income tax bill between now and Caroline’s age ninety was on track to come in at roughly $9.5 million. Money he had been saving toward a retirement that turned out to be — in significant part — the IRS’s retirement.

He read the report three times. Then he read it again with Caroline.

The shape of the problem was straightforward, once he understood the chart. He’d deferred tax at his career-peak rates, telling himself he’d be in a lower bracket in retirement. His advisor had told him the same thing. The hospital’s HR booklet had told him the same thing. But $5 million in pre-tax accounts doesn’t necessarily compound itself into a lower bracket. In Jared’s case, it compounded itself into the same brackets he was in now, except this time with fewer deductions, no business deductions to lean on, and required RMDs to hit at age seventy-five.

And then there was IRMAA. A Medicare surcharge he wasn’t aware of, climbing in tiers based on income from two years prior, on track to add almost $400,000 on top of his retirement’s lifetime bill just for the privilege of having too much income in retirement.

He looked at the chart again, and felt something he hadn’t felt in twenty-five years of practicing emergency medicine. Not embarrassment, exactly. Something quieter. What could be one of the most expensive things in his career had been sitting on his own balance sheet, in plain sight, the entire time he’d been a doctor. And he had never thought to ask.

He put the report on the counter and said something he hadn’t said in a long time:

“Caroline. I think we need to do something about this.”

The Household

  • Jared, 54, emergency medicine physician at a Birmingham hospital
  • Caroline, 49, former RN, now home with three kids
  • Pre-tax retirement: $5,000,000  |  Roth: $0  |  Taxable: $100,000  |  Home: ~$1M
  • Income: $450,000, planning to retire at 60
  • Goal: Spend their retirement on their terms, not the IRS’s

Slowly. In plain words. Without making him feel small.

The new planner walked them through it the way Jared used to walk patients through a complicated diagnosis: slowly, in plain words, without making him feel small.

“Here’s what you didn’t see. Many of your colleagues don’t either. The ones who do often learned it by accident because a friend mentioned it, a podcast caught their attention, someone in their group hired the right advisor. There’s no class on this in residency. There’s no CME credit for it. Your CPA isn’t paid to think about it; he’s paid to file your return. The lifetime tax bill that sits across your retirement is nobody’s job to look at except yours, and nobody taught you how to look at it.”

“It isn’t a personal failing. It’s a structural one. The 401(k) was created in 1978, when the top federal income tax rate was seventy percent. The advice to defer income now, pay it back at a lower rate later during retirement actually worked for many people, because the rate gap between working years and retirement years was larger. The top rate fell. The brackets at the top widened. The advice never updated. Many high-earning W-2 households still do exactly what you did: max the 401(k), rely on the defaults, watch the balance grow, and arrive at retirement with most of their wealth in the most expensive tax bucket and no plan for getting it out.”

“The good news is that you’re not late. You’re early. You have six years until you retire. You have over twenty years until RMDs start. That’s a long runway to do what some of your colleagues started doing earlier in their careers, if we begin now.”

The right intervention, in the right order, at the right time.

It didn’t require Jared to spend less, work longer, or take any investment risk he wasn’t comfortable with. It required him to sequence his money differently. Just like he sequenced a code in the ER. The right intervention, in the right order, at the right time.

His new planner recommended these five moving parts for their specific situation:

  1. 1

    Start filling the Roth side now. Switch his 401(k) contributions from pre-tax to Roth. Open and fund Caroline’s Roth IRA at the spousal contribution limit. Stop deferring more dollars into the bucket that already had too much in it.

  2. 2

    Add an HSA2 and try not to touch it. The hospital plan allowed it; he’d never used it. The potential to be triple-tax-advantaged, treated as a retirement account they can use for health care expenses later in retirement. Fund it. Let it grow. Don’t withdraw a dollar until after sixty-five.

  3. 3

    Run Roth conversions3 in the gap. From age sixty (when he retired) to age seventy-four (the year before RMDs began), there was a fifteen-year window in which their income would drop to a lower level. Each year, fill the 24% bracket with conversions from the IRA to the Roth. Pay tax now, at a known rate, on a known amount, by choice.

  4. 4

    Delay Jared’s Social Security to seventy. Bigger benefit, more years of conversion room, larger survivor income for Caroline.

  5. 5

    Caroline takes spousal benefits at her full retirement age. No meaningful Social Security of her own, but the spousal benefit was real money, and the timing helped protect the household.

The answer was specific.

When the modeling came back, the answer was specific.

The chart Jared had stared at — the one showing the annual tax due that almost always went up year after year — changed. The line leveled out… lower, too. The amounts at age seventy-five and beyond, which had towered above everything else under the default path, came back down inside the lower brackets where they belonged. The IRMAA tier the household lived in for the better part of thirty years dropped by two notches. The income tax, which would have largely reduced the IRAs when the kids inherited them, got cut roughly in half.

Run all the way through Caroline’s age ninety, the difference was:

Lifetime Federal Income Tax
$2.5M

less paid in lifetime federal income tax in retirement.

After-Tax Estate to Heirs
$21M

more passed to the next generation, after tax.

Combined Household Benefit
$23M

total benefit, modeled through Caroline’s age ninety.

All figures in projected future dollars, modeled through 2067.

The estate piece is much bigger than the tax piece for one reason: in their situation, every dollar that doesn’t go to the IRS along the way stays invested in tax-free Roth and HSA accounts, compounding for the next twenty to thirty years before reaching the next generation. The tax savings were the seed. The inheritance was the tree.

Not by working longer. Not by spending less. Not by taking investment risk Jared wasn’t comfortable with. Just by moving money, year by year, out of the most expensive tax bucket into cheaper ones… at his own pace, on his own terms, with someone watching the brackets, the IRMAA tiers, and Caroline’s potential future exposure to single-filer status.

Want to see your version of Jared’s chart?
The Retirement Tax Diagnostic shows you your own projected lifetime tax bill — on the path you’re on now.
Start with the Diagnostic →

It wasn’t just tax savings. It was optionality.

Jared sat with the modeling for a few days before he saw what it actually was. It wasn’t just tax savings. It was optionality.

If he wanted, he could retire a year or two earlier than planned and keep the same lifestyle Caroline had been counting on. He could move to a daytime-only schedule now, a thing he’d been telling Caroline ‘someday’ about for ten years, without changing the retirement date. He could spend seventy-five thousand dollars a year more on whatever showed up: travel, the lake place’s roof, the grandkids when they came, and the inheritance number on the bottom line wouldn’t move. Or he could keep the original retirement plan and leave the kids materially more than the default path ever could have.

Pick any one. Or several. The plan makes room for it.

What the IRS had been quietly taking, for twenty-five years, hadn’t only been money. It had been choices.

The Roth bucket wasn’t only a tax strategy.

The Roth bucket wasn’t only a tax strategy. It was also taking care of Caroline in the event she survived Jared.

If Jared went first, and the actuarial tables plus twenty-five years of overnight ER shifts suggested he might, Caroline would be left filing single for thirteen years before the model ran out. Single brackets cut the doubled-up married brackets roughly in half. The standard deduction would drop. The same RMDs from the same IRA would land at materially higher rates. People in the industry call it the widow’s penalty, and it has a way of arriving exactly when no one wants to do paperwork.

A Roth strategy addresses most of it. So does an HSA she may not need to touch. So does Social Security timed so her survivor benefit is built around Jared’s age-seventy number instead of his age-sixty-two number.

Jared printed the report and walked it into the kitchen. Caroline read it twice.

“The value isn’t in knowing that Roth conversions exist. I knew enough to be dangerous. The value is in knowing how much, when, from which account, under which bracket — and what each decision will do to Medicare premiums, survivor income, and the kids’ inheritance. That isn’t a YouTube project.”

Jared didn’t want a second job in tax planning. He wanted one professional whose full-time job was watching the brackets, IRMAA tiers, and widow’s penalty so he didn’t have to. He’d spent his career being the one who chased down the small details everyone else assumed were fine. And for twenty-five years, what might be the most expensive detail in his life had been sitting on his own balance sheet, in plain sight.

He wasn’t going to miss it for the next twenty-five.

Want to see what your version of Jared’s chart looks like, with a plan?

The Retirement Tax Diagnostic™ tells you what your default path could cost. It doesn’t tell you what’s fixable. That part takes planning built around your income, assets, spouse, kids, and the brackets you’ll actually be living through.

If Jared’s story felt a little too familiar, here is how the work goes from here:

First — the Retirement Tax Diagnostic. A scheduled, no-cost conversation in which you see your own version of Jared’s chart: your projected lifetime tax bill, on the path you’re on now. It is a diagnosis, not a plan — it shows you the number, not what to do about it. If you’re already partway through that process, this is the conversation you’re heading toward. If you’ve never had one, it’s where everyone starts.

Then — the Retirement ℞ Plan™. A one-time, fixed-fee planning engagement across income, taxes, investments, healthcare, and legacy, independently reviewed by a CPA. It turns the diagnostic’s number into a year-by-year plan: how much to convert, in which years, through which brackets, and what each decision does to Medicare premiums, survivor income, and the inheritance. It is a paid engagement because it is real work, and it is the step we ask every household to complete before we manage anything. You keep the plan whether or not you go further.

Jared didn’t want a second job in tax planning. He wanted one professional to handle this for him. If that’s what you’re after, it starts with the Diagnostic: a thirty-minute conversation about your numbers, where we’ll tell you plainly whether we think we can improve your picture.

Schedule Your Retirement Tax Diagnostic →

1 Hypothetical example shown for illustrative purposes only and does not represent an actual client or individual. This scenario and the solutions discussed are not guaranteed; actual results will vary by individual, perhaps significantly. It should not be construed as a recommendation or advice for your situation.

2 HSA accounts can grow tax deferred, with contributions being tax deductible and qualified withdrawals for health care expenses may be taken tax free.

3 Converting an employer plan account to a Roth IRA is a taxable event. Increased taxable income from the Roth IRA conversion may have several consequences including (but not limited to) a need for additional tax withholding or estimated tax payments, the loss of certain tax deductions and credits, and higher taxes on Social Security benefits and higher Medicare premiums. Be sure to consult with a qualified tax advisor before making any decisions regarding your IRA.

The lifetime federal income tax projection on the chart and the IRMAA figure are from the household’s Holistiplan Retirement Tax Diagnostic. The lifetime tax savings, estate, and combined-benefit figures are from the eMoney financial planning model, which captures post-death asset distribution that Holistiplan does not. All dollar figures are projected (future) dollars, cumulative through Caroline’s age ninety (2067). Projections rely on assumptions and are not guaranteed; actual results will vary. Consult your legal and tax advisors before implementing any tax strategy.

This material reflects patterns and tradeoffs that apply broadly, not to every situation. Lifetime tax projections rely on assumptions about future income, growth rates, account balances, and tax law that may not match actual results. Bracket structure and IRMAA thresholds reflect 2026 law as of the time of writing and are subject to change. Nothing here constitutes personalized investment, tax, or legal advice. Consult a qualified tax and financial professional before implementing any strategy. COD00029132

Red Mountain Financial

Red Mountain Financial   |   205-879-7302   |   www.RedMountainFinancial.net

Red Mountain Financial BBB Business Review


Investment advisory services offered through Creative One Wealth, LLC a Registered Investment Advisor. Creative One Wealth, LLC and Red Mountain Financial are unaffiliated entities.

We do not provide tax or legal advice. Always consult with qualified tax/legal advisors regarding your own unique circumstances.

Licensed Insurance Professional. Provided content is for overview and informational purposes only and is not intended and should not be relied upon as individualized tax, legal, fiduciary, or investment advice. By contacting us, downloading booklets, or attending events, you may be offered a meeting to discuss how our insurance and other services can meet your retirement needs. The presenters of this information are not associated with, or endorsed by, the Social Security Administration or any other government agency.

Investing involves risk, including the loss of principal. No Investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect against loss in a period of declining values. Any references to protection benefits or lifetime income generally refer to fixed insurance products, never securities or investment products. Insurance and annuity products are backed by the financial strength and claims-paying ability of the issuing insurance company.

ARE-14063 | 22993

Talbot & Talbot, Inc. D/B/A Red Mountain Financial | 4000 Eagle Point Corporate Dr., Birmingham, AL 35242 | P.O. Box 383033, Birmingham, AL 35238


Additional details are available in our firm's ADV Part 2A and Form CRS. Privacy Policy. Terms of Service.